Endangered Species News reports on federal protection for endangered species, rare plants and rare animals that face a potential population crash or extinction. While the Endangered Species Act does  help these critters recover, it always seem to anger someone.

<')((((((((><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_ This makes NBN suspect there is a reason so few marine species have gone extinct while so many land animals have. There’s an abundance of studies saying the overwhelming ecological pressures marine environments face are eroding and even eliminating entire ecosystems. No one doubts the coincidence of pollution, scorched earth fishing tactics and, most of all, global warming will inevitably mean that once robust marine ecosystems will be badly eroded or cease to exist entirely in 30 or so years. But just like the lobsters and moon snails that have disappeared from Long island but are thriving 150 miles to the north, the species of coral that disappear from the Caribbean will still be found alive elsewhere in the oceans. Is it unreasonable to think all are ready to repopulate their old haunts should environmental conditions allow sometime down the road? The most recent study/forecast we found on the toll these ecological pressures are taking on marine ecosystems makes dire forecasts with only vaguely ominous reference to possible mass extinction. Could that be because it’s hard to actually drive a marine species into extinction?

_So, it’s with a sense of sad pragmatism that NBN forecasts a less ominous future for the earth's once cherished marine ecosystems like Long Island East End and the Caribbean's coral reefs. The study cited above is correct in saying that the next generation is going to see wholesale elimination of entire ecosystems and we suspect that means even greater erosion of the former menagerie of marine wildlife that once lived in such places. But will those species lost go completely extinct? Probably not. Yes, there will be marine extinctions in our future—unless somehow global warming, nutrient loading and reckless fishing techniques all cease in the next 20 years or so. Highly specialized species like manatees, sea turtles, ocean sunfish, and whales come first to mind. Complex, highly diverse ecosystems like coral reefs and eelgrass beds are going to continue to disappear. But water covers three-quarters of the earth’s surface. There will always be refuges from which so many less specialized marine species will be able to stage a comeback, should future environmental conditions permit, and they will. It just won’t be in this generation, or even next. But as humans increasingly threaten themselves with their own extinction, decisions will have to be made that may one day mean folks can once again go noodling for Long Island Sound lobster, should human intelligence not keep pace with our survival instincts.

_   <')((((((((><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_ The stuff was literally everywhere, providing a source of food that eclipses salt marshes and must have nurtured a food pyramid many times the size of what we've seen anytime in the past century or more. That leads NBN to think that modern day, inshore fisheries, even in good years, are a shadow of what they once must have been, largely due to the disappearance of eel grass. And yet we still have commercial interests saying fishing is good.

_You start to wonder if all forms of dredging, whether it’s for fish or shellfish should be much more greatly restricted. It would send the price of scallops and bottom fish through the roof and that would mean fishermen would damn sure learn how to dive and fish without dredges.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~><((((((((()'>

One would think the launch of a five-year survey of the health of the world’s coral reefs would be listed in the Good News section of an environmentally minded website. And the announcement linked above about same was headed right for NBN’s Good News page when we discovered the study is being financed by some Saudi prince. Talk about the road to hell and paving products. Here’s this guy making jillions selling oil, bankrolling a study of the world’s diminishing coral reefs. Reefs that are diminishing, many believe (pdf), because we buy too much of this guy's oil. This is like Rupert Murdoch launching an investigation into bias in the news media. What does this Saudi fellow think he’s going to find and what’s he going do about it when he finds it.

To help the Prince along NBN figured it would add its two cents about the first two reefs this study is going to examine: Hogsty reef and the Inagua Islands reefs. These were truly unblemished tropical marine environments when the good ship Harvey Gamage stopped by some 30 years ago with 24 marine biology college majors aboard. Hogsty reef in particular was mindblowing. It was an atoll reef surrounded by the most beautiful bed of turtle grass being patrolled by an army of Queen conch that could have supported the entire economy of Jamaica for a day or two. The reef itself was crawling with spiny lobster dodging throughout a maze of the most robust growth of elkhorn and stag coral the students onboard the boat has seen in 30 other dives in other parts of the Caribbean.

So, why does the prince start an assessment of the world’s corals reefs in a place where the reefs are likely to be the least distressed? Wouldn’t that money be better spent looking at coral health around a place like Kingston Jamaica. Instead, they hit the most beautiful reefs in the Caribbean. And not on some stripped down research vessel where every inch of deck space is dedicated to the advancement of understanding of marine ecosystems. No, they are hopping aboard the fully air conditioned Golden Shadow, a boat that rents for $140,000 a week and has more jet-skies per capita than Long Beach Island, NJ. Take at look at theGolden Shadow's rental specs which we dug up on the internet. It says she carries “the most impressive collection of water sports equipment ever seen on a private yacht.” Sounds to us like the prince and a few buddies felt like diving in one the few remaining healthy Caribbean coral reefs and then maybe they will take the jet skies out for a spin afterward.

Aright that’s enough. NBN is engaging in extreme equivocation here. We’re making the poor Prince out to be a flim flam man, and the Golden Shadow into the Playboy Mansion. A quick review of his foundation’s annual report says, among 32 self congratulatory pages, that the Golden Shadow gathers: “Knowledge of the reefs and associated habitats, including their location, size,and condition [which] provides the baseline information needed to help manage and protect these reefs.” Furthermore the Golden Shadow's rental specs say she also carries: “a laboratory for marine research that has played a vital role in many oceanographic expeditions.” So, is NBN being unfair in its assessment above? (Here comes the “HOWEVER.”)

In seven years spending $1.5M annually, the Golden Shadow produced two scientific papers. Yet how many billions does the prince make off oil? The Harvey Gamage a.k.a. “The Hardly Damaged” did more to further the cause of marine conservation and it costs about $140,000 per season to ferry marine biology students up and down the coast. Let's do the math. The Golden Shadow produces two scientific papers in seven years. The Harvey Gamage produces 168 marine biology students in the same time. This whole Golden Shadow survey is worth more in public relations to the prince than if he’d hired a Madison Avenue ad firm. So yeah, NBN, is playing the spoiler here. We freely admit if we had to choose between the prince spending his money on the Golden Shadow or Ogilvy and Mather we opt for the former. But let’s recognize the Prince’s efforts for what they really are: half-hearted. If this guy was genuinely concerned about the health of coral reefs, he’d be spending a whole lot more money a whole lot more effectively. Or maybe he’d start making solar panels instead of pumping oil.

Perhaps no other fish epitomizes the dilemma facing fishing and science today more than the blue fin tuna. The documentary “End of the Line” makes it seem like the blue fin is on its last legs. Yet, in this piece the always hysterical, adamantly-opposed-to-conservation-in-any-form Gloucester Times goes after the US government for, what else, conservation efforts aimed at rebuilding blue-fin tuna stocks. First the clarifications. The documentary seems to focus on blue fin tunas over in Europe where they just shot down the latest effort to safeguard the species. Conservation by American fishermen has been much greater, hence the GT’s latest histrionics about the latest call for even more conservation efforts in US waters. If nothing else, it should be illegal to freeze these fish. Freezing fish ruins the taste. You might as well eat cardboard.

So which is it? Are the fish in dire need of protection or can we declare it open season on blue fin tuna? We thought it best to consult an impartial third party: the professional tuna fishermen/carpenter next-door to the offices of NBN. He had a great year: six fish which netted him close to $20,000. We’d also like to reference University of New Hampshire professor Molly Lutcavage, who won the hearts of tuna fishermen across New England with her study a year ago suggesting bluefine tuna numbers on the US side of the Atlantic are much higher than suspected. Finally, let's consider this piece saying the jump in blue fin seen this year reflects an upward bump in a dramatic downturn that’s soon to resume. So, who do we believe, and more importantly, what do we do about it?

Once again, NBN wants to err on the side of caution and conservation. Clearly the GT is part right: the recent calls for conservation may be excessive given the number of tuna found in the western Atlantic this year. We could probably get away with catching more, not less. But in the wake of the oil spill in the gulf, there is recent reason to fear a primary spawning ground for this species has been hard hit. Accordingly, the feast in tuna numbers now might well be followed by famine in a few years time. At a guess, it seems like many fewer American’s make their living off this fish than in Europe. What’s the worst that can happen by cutting back the blue fin catch further in this country: we end up with a bounty of an insanely valuable resource that the rest of the world refused to conserve when it had the chance. Is that a bad thing?

Can we also extend this philosophy to management of all US fisheries. A little hording now will go a long way later when coastal waters elsewhere in the world are stripped clean by a collection of countries less able/inclined to agree on unified management policies. In the meantime, we have a great program you might want to read more about aimed at learning more about this enigmatic pelagic. Here’s a great video we stumbled upon about some maniac spearing a blue fin the size of a Cadillac in the middle of the Atlantic.

Fish getting sunburn may sound like a story ripe for bad puns and oxymoron, but if this article is right, it’s just plain sad. While global warming gets all the press these days, ozone layer depletion is apparently carrying on, causing recently discovered sunburn blisters like these in whales. In the face of enormous problems like ozone depletion and global warming, it’s hard to be hopeful about the future. But, something seemed a little odd about the article above. It claims susceptibility to sunburn appeared to have worsened measurably over the three years of the research involving blue whales. That seems to us an awfully short period of time for something as subject to natural variables as global warming impacts to be reliably recorded in an experiment. If the damage seen over those three years continues for the next 20, shouldn't we be ringing some serious alarm bells. Get the president on the horn! This is a whale of a story, if it’s right. (Sorry, we couldn't resist!)

Staving off panic, NBN looked a little deeper into this issue and found this press release on a new ozone friendly refrigerant called HCR188C1 that received recent federal approval. This stuff is made from hydrocarbons, according to the releases, a chemical that’s pretty much the primary building block for most oil. We found another company putting out an “enviro-friendly” hydrocarbon refrigerant that claims their product to be 32 percent more efficient, meaning you’ll need 32 percent less electricity to keep your beer at 36 degrees if you use enviro-friendly refrigerants. That’s amazing. And the stuff seems to be reasonably priced.

So, why are we hearing about this in press releases nobody reads while whales are getting sunburned? Why aren't we passing legislation forcing refrigerator, air conditioner and aerosol can companies to use enviro-friendly refrigerants? Is it because the ozone depletion concerns over refrigerants dropped off the green radar screen in the 1990s when Dupont replaced its dangerous refrigerant called Freon with another chemical less destructive to the ozone called Tetrafluoroethane? Sadly, tetrafluoroethane maybe be better for the ozone but it’s a disaster for global warming and Europe is banning tetrafluoroethane next year. (No such ban proposed for the US that we can find.)

So, where does that leave us with our rapidly deteriorating whale sunburn problem? This is where the issue gets a little muddy, as does our argument. If ozone depletion is still active enough for science to see it increasing sunburn rates in whales over three years, should we perhaps be directing more effort to finding out why? If not, why not? This article in the NYTimes provides something of an answer and that is: we don’t know the answer. And when you don't know the answer, it's much easier to confuse the question. There are so many uncertainties around ozone depletion and global warming as to make conclusions a rarity and action plans a near impossibility despite the growing number of alarm bells that are, or should, be ringing. However, when you see something like a 32 percent improvement in energy efficiency in a product that also poses no problem for the environment it should be a no-brainer, regardless of the ozone layer, global warming and whale sunburn. That's your answer. Why are we reading about it in press releases and not seeing legislation promoting it? Because logic doesn't always rule the roost in Congress, but campaign contributions and lobbyists do. (PDF) Besides, people have been screaming about saving the whales for years. Relax, buy some sunblock. Does Dupont make that, too?

In the 08.03.10 Endangered News--see below--we cited stats from this chart saying national piping plover numbers were stagnating. When researching the subject again recently we found this study by US Fish and Wildlife indicating the number of nesting plovers has doubled between 1986 and 2006. The error resulted from not completely reading the chart above. Mea Culpa. 

Since piping plover chicks are leaving nests all over the East Coast right now, NBN thought it might be a good time to inventory how shore-goers are dealing with the annual inconvenience of beach closings aimed at protecting the endangered animals’ nesting sites. First we have a $2,500 reward for information leading to who robbed 4 eggs from a piping plover nest at Hampton Beach State Park in New Hampshire. Then we have illegally dismantled blockades that were protecting piping plover nests in Buxton, NC, forcing park officials there to close completely a popular boat ramp until the nestlings had fledged. Next, federal officials are investigating piping plover deaths by a protected nest site blocking a fishing access road at the Robert Moses State Park, on Long Island, NY. We also have new proposals to rope off some of Cape Cod’s famed shoreline to protect the plovers there, stirring up bitter words in blue-blood Boston. (Say that ten times fast!) Then we’ve got an East Hampton, NY, four-wheeler running over a baby plover and getting stuck in the sand when a park ranger flagged him down.

Might it be time for a change in attitude and approach to the piping plover problem? NBN is not advocating lifting all protections or prosecutions. People willing to vent their frustrations on a baby animal with fewer natural defenses than an earth worm should be sent to jail. (Incidentally, we couldn’t find one story of an arrest in such cases.) Rather, we’d prefer another approach to these protection measures that might eliminate some of the anger over this issue.

The gulf oil spill may provide something of an opportunity here. It appears the spill will make life even more difficult for these birds, but this article discusses one farmers’ efforts to use his fields as alternative habitat for plovers that spend winter on Gulf shores. On 03.25 this article suggested building new nesting sites for shore birds using dredge spoils. If we really want to restore plover populations, shouldn’t we start taking a much harder look at building new offshore habitat for them? If we're smart about it, it shouldn't be obscenely expensive and it might be more successful: dredge spoils are a preferred nesting spot for plovers.

 Seals are so cute. They've got those big, black doey eyes and faces like puppy dogs. Who would have thought they'd present so many problems? First it was seals stealing striped bass right from fishermens' hooks. Now seals are already attracting great white sharks to Cape Cod, MA, this coming summer. Great white sharks eat seals like sardines. (Is that a great video or what?) They've also been known to nibble on a surfer dude or two who can look just like seals when seen from below. Thus seals are posing a gnarly problem these days Years ago, they were given protected status under wildlife laws because we were concerned their numbers were dwindling.

Now, their numbers are rebounding and so are the number of shark attacks on anything that looks like a seal swimming in the water. You can conjure up all sorts of sympathy for seals when you have Canadians clubbing them to make clothing. But, when people start dying in the digestive systems of fish for the sake of saving the seals. Well, lets just say the seal population off Cape Cod could find itself with a bit of a public relations problem this summer. Does that mean the Canadians will open seal-clubbing season again. Who knows? The International Whaling Commission is talking about lifting its 20-year ban on whaling. Stayed tuned.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~><((((((((()'>

When I first heard about vernal ponds it was during my daily story scrounge as the environmental reporter for the Eagle Tribune. The story sounded great: getting overtime wandering in the woods at night looking for frogs and salamanders. I was not prepared for cacophony of thousands of sex-crazed frogs or the writhing spectacle of salamander orgies, politely called congressing, that greeted me and my photographer around 9 pm that sultry spring evening. I've been a vernal pond fan every since.

All kinds of steps are being taken to help these creatures. Vermont just got $150,000 to install culvert road crossings near a particularly busy vernal pond. “Salamander Crossing” signs have been installed in Homewood, AL, and Ipswich, MA. Vernal pond mapping projects are also gaining steam. In these, volunteers are asked to document the wildlife at suspected vernal ponds and if it meets certain thresholds, it can be protected by wetlands laws. This obviously isn't sitting well with some development minded folks, but with the slow down in construction the winds are blowing in favor of the amphibians. So, today's lesson is: let's seize the day. Next spring when the first warm rains are forecast, see if there is a vernal pond group willing to introduce you to a little amphibian amore. Salamanders can be very sexy. (If you have a minute, or five of them, take a look at this great vernal pond video below.)

<')((((((((><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Boston's Channel 7 News this week ran a segment on the season's first spotting of rare North Atlantic right whales off Cape Cod. However, the camera footage was of humpback whales. That prompted an email apology sent to science types by the New England Aquarium which was interviewed for the segment. The NEA didn't want anyone who knew the difference between the two whales to think the aquarium didn't. Who told the TV station the whales were North Atlantic right whales is anyone's guess, but apparently it wasn't the aquarium. They were just called for comment. (Pictured here is a humpback and below is a North Atlantic right whale.) The NEA email produced more emails from the science types that received it including this sad response from a northern right whale expert over in Seattle.

“As imperiled as they are, North Atlantic right whales are doing comparatively well compared to the population I now work on in the eastern N Pacific.  We recently estimated their abundance from mark-recapture photo-id and genetic data at a whopping 30 animals (yes, thirty).  While that is probably an underestimate that relates more to a sub-stock using the SE Bering Sea, the overall population clearly isn't much larger.  The legacy of intensive 19th century whaling, and devastating illegal catches by the USSR in the 1960's. So it may not seem like it, but you're actually an order of magnitude better off [in the Atlantic]! Cheers, Phil Clapham National Marine Mammal Lab, Seattle”

The North Atlantic right whale gets an amazing amount of press, primarily because there is concern the creature's numbers are getting so low, they may go extinct. They also strike a sympathetic cord because so may die from ship strikes. However, rarely in all this coverage is mentioned that there is a North Pacific right whale and a southern right whale, the latter numbers well into four-figures. In the spirit of Channel 7's screw up, NBN also wants to correct a post last year regarding these whales. We said the northern and south right whales were not distinct species. But this Wikipedia post makes clear we're wrong and why. We're fessing up now because we originally wrote the piece last year to suggest all this talk about endangered North Atlantic right whales was just fretting about one group of a species of whale that seemed to be doing a lot better elsewhere. Not only was NBN wrong, but now we have this sad news about the surprising death of 300 southern right whales off the coast of Argentina.

All to often the rush to put out copy trumps the accuracy of that copy. But the incorrect information lingers in civilization's collective conversation. NBN's original post was based on a recollection about right whales from an interview with an expert who knows his north from south. We should have double checked. As the amount of easily available information expands exponentially via internet access, it points up more than ever the need to double check your sources. But even more so when it comes to environmental issue where reader sympathy is so important. NBN's incorrect post could effect a readers decision to contribute to supporting the North Atlantic right whale. We will do better. We're not so sure about Channel 7. Don Henley got it right about TV.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~><((((((((()'>

What's a poor treehugger to do. On one hand we have this really neat half-chicken, half-bird called the sage grouse, on the other we hand we have prime real estate for solar panels and wind turbines. Both are ideally suited for specific stretches of the country's high plains, and apparently both can't be there at the same time, according to this piece in the Las Vegas Sun. What to do? Get used to it and say good-by to the grouse, if need be. Perhaps we can avoid the fowl's extinction as we pave over this gorgeous country with solar and wind farms. But a fresh crop of global warming warning stories has NBN once again thinking ecological Armageddon is upon us. That means the grouse could be facing far greater threats than losing habitat to alternative energy ambitions.

Even in ideal conditions, these birds are pretty scarce. They need a very specific environment: windy, high dessert plains that will quite likely becomes too dry and windy for these fowl if global warming goes un-checked. As we've said before here in NBN, Global Warming is going to force some very unpleasant decisions on us. Fortunately for the grouse, and a lot of other threatened animals in the world, there are a lot of people looking out for them. This federal map designates the boundaries of local working groups dedicated to saving the grouse. These groups are no doubt bummed out by the recent federal decision not to offer federal endangered protection to the grouse. However, nature lovers farther afield can take some solace knowing these groups out west are protecting one endangered species while they  concern themselves with other struggling species.

At the same time, grouse hunters are delighted this endangered bird can still be placed in their shotgun sights. These folks are no doubt an endangered species as well. How long can we expect hunting season to stay open on a bird that's rapidly disappearing. This is where the hard decisions will have to come in, and a lot of angry people will no doubt come out. Just as the grouse occupies a very specific ecological niche, grouse hunters occupy a very specific recreational niche. As more and more animals inch closer to the endangered species list, so must those who exploit them. Get used to it. There's nothing wrong with hunting, providing you're hunting the right animal. If you can't kill grouse, kildeer. PTP. Here's a five-alarm press release from the National Wildlife Federation grousing about the grouse. Also, here's a cool video of the sage grouse in action.

<')((((((((><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Let's go to the internet. YouTube had this video in the first page of searches for “Manatee Abuse.” It seems to pretty much cover the gamut of the complaints in the PEER release above which has: “people poking, chasing, standing on or kicking manatees, as well as separating mothers from calves each year.” The video is pretty sad to watch. But, most of the other YouTube manatee abuse videos had the same footage. Thus, a very cursory search suggests the problem isn't as bad as the problem PEER is named for. They are Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. When this group first started sending out press releases, they were all about protecting whistle-blowers in environmental agencies.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~><((((((((()'>

The Newburyport Daily News in Massachusetts reported this summer that 2009 was very good year for the Plum Island population of Piping Plover. It better have been, because the birds are given free rein to nine miles of prime Atlantic oceanfront for the purposes of raising chicks for the better part of the summer. It's hard to find a larger section of public beach shut down for a longer period of time than the Plum Island Piping Plover nursery. However, similar shut-downs close off equally large percentages of prime bay beaches on Long Island, Cape Cod, even in Wisconsin. Beach enthusiasts don't take these closings well, hence the advent of tee-shirts and bumper stickers like this one here. What makes it worse is, oftentimes these baby Plovers, or the eggs, are eaten by predators like skunks, raccoon and fox, whose numbers are on the rise.

These shut-downs are no minor inconvenience. The idea that it's being done in futility on any given year is frustrating and brings into question the whole policy. Take a gander, PTP (Pardon the Pun) at this note just in from MassWildlife. Peregrin falcons were once as scarce as hensteeth, PTP. Now, their numbers are taking off, PTP. Ditto for the Northeast's osprey population. I was just down on Long Island, NY and the birds were circling overhead everywhere. When I was growing up down there, ospreys were nonexistent. And, we all know the success of the bald eagle in the Lower 48 over the past decade. That's the way it works, according to MassWildlife's wildlife expert Tom French. The populations of these struggling species will not respond immediately to restoration measures taken on their behalf.

That's the way it works, according to MassWildlife's wildlife expert Tom French. The populations of these struggling species will not respond immediately to restoration measures taken on their behalf. They take a little while then, when numbers reach critical mass, the populations take off. That's what happened with the striped bass populations of the East Coast. But it does beg the question of how much sacrifice should be made on behalf of these critters when you don't see the kind of improvements you want, and the piping plover is being generously out-shined by the raptors. The piping plover is not a raptor. In the survival-of-the-fittest scale, they are quite a few rungs down from the raptors and just a few rungs above earthworms before learning to fly.

Raptors numbers dropped sharply when the pesticide DDT, which built up in the fish they eat. That weakened their shells so the mother osprey, falcon eagle...ect, couldn't sit on them. The DDT didn't help plovers any either. But, they are also suffering from habitat loss and that's a much harder problem to correct than just banning DDT.
Raptors numbers dropped sharply when the pesticide DDT, which built up in the fish they eat. That weakened their shells so the mother osprey, falcon eagle...ect, couldn't sit on them. The DDT didn't help plovers any either. But, they are also suffering from habitat loss and that's a much harder problem to correct than just banning DDT. Stil, as this chart shows, plover numbers are climbing too. However, we're left with a quandary. When the plover populations start to show the same success as the raptors will the beaches then be opened all summer? We've paid a much bigger price to bring the plover back than what was needed to bring the raptors back.

<')((((((((><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~