- NEWS BY NATURE: Home Page
- OPINION PAGE
- RECYCLING NEWS
- GLOBAL WARMING NEWS
- SOLAR POWER NEWS
- WIND POWER NEWS
- ALTERNATIVE ENERGY NEWS
- GOOD NEWS
- BAD NEWS
- WEIRD SCIENCE NEWS
- POPULAR WISDOM, Or Lack Thereof
- ENDANGERED SPECIES NEWS
- COMMERCIAL FISHING POLICY NEWS
- WATERSHED NEWS
- SCHOOL NEWS
- INVASIVE SPECIES NEWS
- BIODIVERSITY NEWS
- WASTEWATER WOES AND WONDERS
- DOWN ON THE FARM NEWS
- SERVICES: What NBN can do for you.
- 2012 RSS FEED ARCHIVE
- 2012 ASSORTED GREENERY ARCHIVE
- 2012 Cover Archives
- 2011 COVER ARCHIVES
- 2010 COVER ARCHIVES
COMMERCIAL FISHING POLICY NEWS
Today’s Catch is devoted to the commercial fishing industry, the marine ecosystems it depends on, and the catch shares and catch quota policies being put in place to protect both. As fisheries collapse commercial fishermen, particularly draggers, get blamed for damage to ocean floor ecosystems. The fishermen blame the science behind the policies and we try to represent both on this page.
<')((((((((><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do We Want Fish or Fishermen?
Increasingly, it appears we can't have both in the numbers we'd like 11.01.11

Senators Kerry (left) and Brown
In hearings two weeks back elected officials of every stripe piled on NOAA head Jane Lubchenco saying her feeble command of the facts is costing Northeast commercial fishing communities their heritage and jobs. They say she’s a know-nothing mouth piece for the environmental movement whose disastrous catch share policy has cripple an industry and cost jobs in one of the worst economies in recent history. We particularly love this quote by Democratic U.S. Senator John Kerry who said regarding catch shares: “This clearly threatens the future of small boat fishing in Massachusetts.”
We’d like to ask Mr. Kerry what’s
more threatening to small fishing boats, the disappearance of fish from
overfishing or government regulations like catch shares designed to correct that
overfishing? Kerry, and all the New England politicians that agree with
him, don’t seem to realize catch shares was a desperate measure to end
over fishing that has cost a lot more fishermen their jobs than the
government regulation ever could, particularly in the north Atlantic.
The chart above shows the fleet was cut nearly in half between 1992 and
2008. Catch shares went into effect in 2010.
Share Commercial Fishing policy News on Twitter
_______________________
2010 Commercial Fishing Policy News Archive
______________________
______________________
More Commercial Fishing Policy News
It’s in the north Atlantic that catch shares is crippling the bottom fishing industry known as trawling. Trawling, on the other hand is in large part to blame, according to many of the scientists in Lubchenco’s agency, for the overfishing. Stocks of bottom fish like cod, haddock and pollock, struggle mightily year in and year out to keep pace with the nets that are dragged year in and year out over their habitat. If you destroy the habitat you destroy the ecosystem these bottom fish stocks depend on. It’s that destruction that, NBN believes, is a second but unstated reason for the catch shares policy Lubchenco is being accused of being clueless about.

Day Boats in Gloucester, they catch the freshest fish.
Is it unreasonable then to think Lubchenco's policies are deliberately designed by her NOAA scientists to shrink the ground fishing fleet in places like the north Atlantic? Fewer large boats are going to be easier to manage than many smaller ones. It’s only when the fleet is dramatically consolidated that science can hope to catch up with and more effectively monitor the damage that fleet is doing. Here’s a more interesting question. Is it possible the table pounding politicians are in on it? Folks like Kerry talk to the scientists behind closed doors. They get the straight skinny without the emotional appeals of the damage being done to fishermen’s families and an iconic American tradition. NBN can’t help but get the feeling someone like Kerry is a hellova lot more powerful than Lubchenco. If he wanted catch-shared ended it would be.
Please click here to add your two cents. Or two bits.

Lubchenco, taking it on the chin in Gloucester
While Lubchenco may or may not be clueless, the scientists she keeps deferring to in hearings like the one mentioned above, know exactly what they are doing: they are trying to cripple an industry that has crippled North Atlantic ocean floor ecosystems that support the bottom fish these fishermen depend on for their livelihood. No doubt there was a time when the boundless North Atlantic could support the armada of bottom trawlers that raked over the soft corals and rocky bottoms that host these fragile ecosystems, ecosystems that take centuries to establish themselves. Not anymore. There are too many boats taking too many fish. As the same time there are too many unknowns about the long term damage they are doing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~><((((((((()'>
