- NEWS BY NATURE: Home Page
- OPINION PAGE
- RECYCLING NEWS
- GLOBAL WARMING NEWS
- SOLAR POWER NEWS
- WIND POWER NEWS
- ALTERNATIVE ENERGY NEWS
- GOOD NEWS
- BAD NEWS
- WEIRD SCIENCE NEWS
- POPULAR WISDOM, Or Lack Thereof
- ENDANGERED SPECIES NEWS
- COMMERCIAL FISHING POLICY NEWS
- WATERSHED NEWS
- SCHOOL NEWS
- INVASIVE SPECIES NEWS
- BIODIVERSITY NEWS
- WASTEWATER WOES AND WONDERS
- DOWN ON THE FARM NEWS
- SERVICES: What NBN can do for you.
- 2012 RSS FEED ARCHIVE
- 2012 ASSORTED GREENERY ARCHIVE
- 2012 Cover Archives
- 2011 COVER ARCHIVES
- 2010 COVER ARCHIVES
Welcome to the
OPINION PAGE
Everyone Has Got One Here's Ours
Of Jobs, Ingenuity and the Lack Thereof 02.07.12
At 5 pm Friday I found myself in a hotel room watching the latest he-man program to be offered up by The Discovery Channel, something called Gold Rush. The urge to reach through the flatscreen TV and strangle the grizzled mountains of human flesh neutering vast pristine Alaskan landscapes with flat-track backhoes was overwhelming. Instead, I started typing furiously 650 words that I’m now rewriting in case a serial killer targeting land-raping Alaska gold miners emerges and I become a prime suspect. That’s about how upsetting this profoundly stupid series is. Even more upsetting is knowing this program is enjoyed by enough folks to turn a profit for the criminally negligent clowns producing it, no doubt under the firm conviction their audience, and the cast, have the collective IQ of an algae bloom.

Grampa gets the bad news.
The episode I watched opened with some 17-year-old kid named Parker— yes, 17—disemboweling a lush Alaska mountainside in search of an extra 50-ounces of gold that will put “Grampa’s mine” on a paying basis. Some federal agent, belly engulfing his belt buckle, shows up and finds more safety violations than an OSHA inspector training school instructor on exam day. The inspector is almost apologetic when Grampa complains that he’s run the same mine without incident for 23 years. Nowhere in any of this nonsense emerges any talk about the environmental havoc being wreaked for a business that needs to extract another $30,000 to meet payroll. Can anyone doubt how Sarah Palin became governor of this place? The program jumps from Parker’s troubles to another barely break-even miner shut down by the same instructor cursing the job-killing regulations in this country with an American flag super-imposed in the background. I swear I am not making any of this up.

The pursuit of happiness, 40 hrs/ wk.
What I hope makes this story worth your time is the irony that found me in that hotel room watching Gold Rush. I had spent the past three days discussing marketing opportunities for a software program that allows one office manager do the work of three. While the software is putting tens of thousands of people to work designing, selling and installing this product, the end game in this industry is to dramatically reduce the ranks of office workers in this country. So I find myself in the unique position of cheering on an overweight government regulator putting miners out of work after three days cheering on software vendors putting office managers out of work, all in the middle of a crushing recession. How in the heck do I reconcile such sentiments and efforts with a general desire to wish the whole of humanity, profoundly destructive gold miners included, life liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

The modern day gold mine?
Use of the constitutional clause here is no coincidence. It cuts right to the vision that NBN and a few other brave souls are starting to see for this country. How do we eliminate the tens of millions of jobs that exist solely through destruction of natural resource and/or operational inefficiency—think highway tollbooth collectors—while still guaranteeing U.S. citizens life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? We change the jobs and the hours spent working them, that’s how. Why not ask those gold miners to turn their attentions to mining the resources found in our landfills. How do we make it worth their while? By dramatically hiking the cost of making new plastic cups, glass bottles, metal containers and paper—think cap and trade and instituting an obscene federal gas tax. As far as the work-saving software is concerned, how about sharing the reduced work load among the staff that might otherwise be let go, with all working fewer hours?

Hand polishing tank shells. Now that's productivity!
Both provisions no-doubt mean that by some measures our standard of living will go down dramatically. But, more often than not those standards will be the sorts measured in miles-per-gallon, cubic feet, and calories. At the same time one standard of living will vastly improve: the amount of free time we have to pursue happiness. I’m not talking happiness al-la Engels, Marx and Mao. If happiness is spending your life working in order that you can sleep in a waterfront McMansion with jetskies and a swimming pool, our Constitution guarantees you that right and it’s a good thing. What the constitution should not guarantee is the pursuit of such luxuries to the exclusion of others, and as natural resources become increasingly scarce that’s inevitable.

Acres of Alaskan woods were leveled for this much gold.
Whether it’s through destroying mountainsides of lush Alaskan Wilderness for gold that’s measured in Dixie cups or subsidizing managerial jobs through the use of inefficient operational methods, both result in inflated living standards the planet can no longer sustain. That doesn’t mean you should be denied the right to work 60 hours a week, 50 weeks a year in order to be spend the other two weeks in Disney World or Aspen. But with the population of the world growing rampantly is the idea of working 30 weeks a year and spending the remaining 20 weeks, hiking, playing with your children or random internet research in the name of science—think NBN—such a bad alternative? On the other hand, if we still want to waste our diminishing natural resources, NBN kind of likes the idea of being allowed to. However, the cost of doing so must go way up, in order to compensate those willing to not be so wasteful.
_~~~~~~~~~~~~~><((((((((()'>
_I Want My MTV, To Help Explain GHG
(Greenhouse Gasses) 01.17.12
_The
fellows who came to deliver my new mattress were the sort of young
adults adrift in career options you’d expect to be humping
furniture through warrens of household hallways in New England.
One was a quiet Hispanic, the other a white kid holding a clipboard—a
distinction earned, no doubt, by virtue of his command of English. I
pride myself on getting such task-oriented folks to consider the
world around the job-at-hand, and soon was enjoying an animated
give-and-take with the white guy. That’s when I mentioned my latest
read: “The
Great Disruption: Why the Climate Crisis Will Bring On the End of
Shopping and the Birth of a New World.”
_“You mean you
believe all that stuff about global warming?” he asked with sincere
curiosity. Now, it would be easy to say something snide here about
the coincidence of this fellow’s job and his skepticism over widely
accepted science, but there was a conviction and clarity in his voice
that sparked my curiosity. It seemed clear this was a fellow who’d
done more than listen to Rush Limbaugh rants in coming to the
conclusion that global warming is baloney. A real, live global
warming skeptic, who has all his teeth and can form complete
sentences, in my house! For me, this kid held the fascination of
finding a rare turtle in an inner city back yard. Imagine my
astonishment when he asked if I’d read any of Noam
Chomsky’s writings.
_He
started to belabor some well worn theories challenging global warming
and the economic dangers of higher taxes on fossil fuels, a tax
policy dear to NBN’s heart. He asked if I knew that all the planets
in our solar system were getting warmer, not just earth. I listened
patiently for a few minutes and then hit him with my best shot.
“There’s no way,” I said, “That the world can burn all the
fossil fuels we’ve burned since the industrial revolution and not
create a huge imbalance in the atmosphere that is credited with
allowing life on earth to get started in the first place. Who in
their right mind would continue to saw away at a branch so much of
the planet relies on, particularly when other sources of energy
exist?”
_Oddly
enough, that seemed to give this fellow some pause as I ushered him
out the door and headed up the stairs to Google “planets warming”
on my computer. Why do I belabor it here? Because, in a perfect
world, there should be no overlap in anyone's mind between Noam Chomsky and Rush
Limbaugh. One seeks out information to gain perspective, the other to
gain power. Yet here is this guy who has incorporated both into a
unique perspective that I now wish I’d spent a little more time
exploring. Instead there is less overlap then I would like between his perspective and mine.
_Sadly,
these days it seems we all increasingly gravitate toward those we agree with, because it’s
easier. So, my New Year’s resolution, along with the basement
recycling center I’ve hardly started, is to spend more time with
people I disagree with. If we’re going to unify our country that’s
the only way it will happen. Politicians bribed by corporate
interests really want U.S. voters to believe that the world is made
of liberals and conservatives and never the twain shall meet. Those
two forces met in the hallway of a small house in Massachusetts and
hopefully both were better for the brief encounter. I know I was.
Please click here to add your two cents. Or two bits.
_<:)((((((((><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

